-
Aspro Atlantic Medikal Turizm Ticaret Limited Şirketi t/a AsproMED
A paid-for Facebook ad for cosmetic surgery abroad was irresponsible, trivialised the decision to undergo surgery, contained misleading claims about bariatic surgery and misleadingly omitted information regarding the need for pre-consultation.
-
Ersoy Health Services Tourism Ltd t/a Clinic Haus
A paid-for Facebook ad for cosmetic surgery abroad irresponsibly implied a time-limited promotion, trivialised the decision to undergo surgery and misleadingly omitted information regarding the need for pre-consultation.
-
AHK Designs Ltd t/a Victoriaplum.com
A website, Instragram account and X account for Victoria Plum made misleaing claims about the longevity of the brand, its customer service reviews and its total number of customers served.
-
Avensure Ltd t/a Employment Law Advice Bureau
A direct mailing to a business was not obviously identifiable as an ad.
-
Kingsland Drinks Ltd t/a Kingsland Wines & Spirits
A label on a bottle mislead consumers by failing to disclose the significant conditions of a competition.
-
Pink Self Storage Ltd
A website ad made misleading claims about price and hidden fees.
-
Sony Interactive Entertainment Network Europe Ltd t/a PlaySation
An ad for 'Call of Duty Modern Warfare III' was not irresponsibly targeted
-
We Are TALA Ltd
Two Instagram reels and four TikToks on influencer Grace Beverly's accounts were not obviously identifiable as ads.
-
Festival Free Bets
A post on Astrid Wett’s X (formerly Twitter) page, advertising a company that collated betting offers, broke gambling ad rules by featuring someone under 25.
-
Hangcure Ltd t/a Hangcure
A TikTok ad for a hangover cure claimed that a food supplement could treat human disease.
-
Prettylittlething.com Ltd t/a Prettylittlething.com
A series of tweets misleadingly implied that a promotion included all product lines, failed to include the closing dates or times of the promotion and misleadingly implied that further discounts would not be available when the promotion ended.
-
Tonic Nutrition Ltd t/a Tonic Health
A website and Instagram reel made unauthorised nutrition and comparative nutrition claims, and discredited competitors' products.
-
ProgressPlay Ltd
A website advertising a gambling promotion failed to disclose significant conditions of entry.
-
Tecnología Sostenible y Responsable SL (TSR) t/a Sustainable and Responsible Technology SL
A paid-for X ad made misleading claims about the effect of blue light on eyes.
-
Independent British Vape Trade Association t/a IBVTA
A newspaper advertorial indirectly promoted unlicenced e-cigarettes.
-
Lark Holdings Limited
A website misleadingly claimed that a programme could permanently eliminate an array of mental health disorders and discouraged essential treatment for conditions for which medical supervision should be sought.
-
Postcode Lottery Ltd t/a People's Postcode Lottery
A TV ad for the Postcode Lottery featuring Emma Willis was not likely to be of strong appeal to under-18s.
-
Whitbread Group plc t/a Premier Inn, Beefeater
A paid-for search ad made misleading claims about the price of hotel rooms.
-
Dr Bunny Aesthetics
An online listing for a cosmetic surgery practitioner advertised prescription-only medicines and misleadingly implied a doctor or someone with a general medical qualification ran the service.
-
GKOnlineCo Pty Ltd t/a Pups Den, Official Aida Store
A paid-for social media ad made medicinal claims about an unlicenced product.
Rulings
Our rulings are published every Wednesday and set out on the public record how, following investigation, the advertising rules apply and where we draw the line in judging whether an ad has broken the rules. We also publish a list of companies and organisations which, following receipt of a complaint, agreed to amend or withdraw their ad without the need for a formal investigation.
Rulings (309)