-
ContextLogic Inc t/a Wish.com
Four in-app ads for the e-commerce platform Wish were banned for placing explicit sexual images in apps that were likely to be used by children.
-
LC International Limited t/a Coral
A tweet on a gambling company’s Twitter feed broke the rules by presenting a promotion in a way that was likely to encourage potentially harmful gambling behaviour.
-
LC International Ltd t/a Ladbrokes
A TV ad for a gambling company did not break the rules on encouraging gambling behaviour that was socially irresponsible or portray gambling as indispensable.
-
Mizkan Euro Ltd t/a Branston
A poster ad for vinegar did not condone or encourage poor nutritional habits or an unhealthy lifestyle in children.
-
NewDay Ltd
A TV ad for a credit card and balance transfers did not break the rules on social responsibility.
-
Hey Habito Ltd
A TV and VOD ad for an online mortgage broker featuring cartoon gory horror was scheduled appropriately to prevent it from likely being seen by young children.
-
ITV Broadcasting Ltd
A TV ad for a film was not scheduled inappropriately as children made up only a small proportion of the audience and it was not directed at or likely to be of particular appeal to them.
-
ITV Broadcasting Ltd
Two TV ads for a video game were not scheduled inappropriately.
-
Sky UK Ltd t/a Sky, NowTV
TV ads for a video game and a film were not scheduled inappropriately.
-
Vape Nation Ltd t/a 88Vape
Two bus posters advertising vaping equipment did not directly target children.
-
Profit Accumulator Ltd
Instagram posts for a betting company were banned for being irresponsible as they suggested matched betting could be a solution to financial concerns.
-
Warner Bros. Entertainment UK Ltd
An ad on the Classic Lullabies playlist on Spotify for the film It Chapter Two was irresponsible for causing distress for children.
-
Easy Shopping 4 Home Ltd
A product listing on Amazon for face masks claiming to protect consumers from coronavirus was misleading and irresponsible and likely to cause fear without justifiable reason.
-
Missguided Ltd
A poster by a fashion brand objectified women and was likely to cause offence while another was unlikely to break the rules on the same grounds.
-
Novads OU
Paid-for display ads and website claims for face masks claiming to protect consumers from coronavirus were misleading and irresponsible and likely to cause fear without justifiable reason.
-
Prettylittlething.com Ltd t/a Prettylittlething.com
An ad on YouTube for a clothing retailer was banned for objectifying women.
-
Hey Habito Ltd
A print ad for a mortgage broker did not break the rules around harm and offence.
-
Bacardi Global Brands Ltd t/a Bombay Sapphire Gin
A VOD and cinema ad for gin did not break the rules around implying alcohol was capable of changing mood or enhancing creativity.
-
Betway Ltd
A YouTube ad for a gambling company broke the rules for featuring an individual who was under the age of 25.
-
Missguided Ltd
A TV ad for a clothing company did not encourage irresponsible drinking.
-
Person(s) unknown
Media: Internet (on own site)
Topic: Gender, sex and relationships