Rulings (16)
  • KS Competitions Ltd

    • Upheld
    • 02 December 2020

    A website ad promoting a competition to win hair products breached the CAP Code for not explaining the free entry route and for stating that its closing date would be extended if all tickets were not sold.

  • Person(s) unknown t/a TBM Enterprises and Thebettingman

    • Upheld
    • Internet (social networking)
    • 18 November 2020

    An Instagram story by Sam Gowland was not obviously identifiable as an ad and broke the rules on social responsibility for suggesting using betting tipsters was a way of achieving financial security.

  • LC International Ltd t/a Gala Spins

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 28 October 2020

    A paid-for Facebook post by a gambling company was banned for being of particular appeal to children.

  • Profit Accumulator Ltd t/a Bonus Accumulator

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 14 October 2020

    A paid-for Facebook post and a website post for a betting company were banned for presenting gambling as a way to achieve financial security, for being misleading and for being socially irresponsible.

  • Betfair Casino Ltd t/a Betfair Casino

    • Not upheld
    • 07 October 2020

    A TV ad for Betfair did not portray, condone or encourage gambling behaviour that was socially irresponsible.

  • ElectraWorks Ltd t/a BWIN party, Party Poker

    • Upheld
    • 07 October 2020

    A paid-for Google search ad for a betting website irresponsibly suggested consumers could achieve financial security by gambling.

  • Omaze Inc

    • Upheld
    • 07 October 2020

    A website promotion for a house raffle competition did not clearly explain the free route entry.

  • Paul Coleman

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 17 June 2020

    A website promoting gambling systems made misleading claims about the success and profitability of the system and was socially irresponsible for suggesting gambling could provide an alternative to employment or was a way to achieve financial security.

  • LC International Limited t/a Coral

    • Upheld
    • Social media (own site)
    • 03 June 2020

    A tweet on a gambling company’s Twitter feed broke the rules by presenting a promotion in a way that was likely to encourage potentially harmful gambling behaviour.

  • LC International Ltd t/a Ladbrokes

    • Not upheld
    • Television
    • 03 June 2020

    A TV ad for a gambling company did not break the rules on encouraging gambling behaviour that was socially irresponsible or portray gambling as indispensable.

  • Hydro Solutions Fylde Ltd t/a Elite Competitions

    • Upheld
    • Internet (sales promotion)
    • 06 May 2020

    A website page for prize competitions was misleading because the free entry route was unclear, the closing date was extended without good reason and a prize of 70% of ticket sales was not a reasonable equivalent to the advertised prizes.

  • ASTOK Ltd t/a TVBet

    • Upheld
    • Poster, Newspaper, Magazine
    • 15 April 2020

    A media screen and a press ad for a provider of live games to the betting industry made misleading #1 and best-selling claims.

  • persons unknown t/a Luxsleeps

    • Upheld
    • Internet (social networking)
    • 18 March 2020

    An Instagram post promoting a competition to win a bed broke the rules as the prize was not awarded.

  • Velvet Sofa Ltd t/a Glasgow Sofa

    • Upheld
    • Internet (social networking)
    • 04 March 2020

    Two Facebook posts for a furniture retailer featured promotions that were misleading and conducted unfairly.

  • Candy Coat Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Internet (on own site)
    • 19 February 2020

    A website for a nail polish company did not promote its reward programme fairly and honourably.

  • News Group Newspapers Ltd t/a The Sun

    • Upheld
    • Internet (on own site), National press
    • 29 January 2020

    An ad on The Sun for tickets to Legoland was banned for not making clear the limitations of the promotion to participants.