-
Sports Supplements Ltd t/a Bulk
An email contained a promotion which wasn't capable of being used and so wasn't administered fairly.
-
LC International Ltd t/a Coral
A mobile digital billboard ad for Coral was not inappropriately placed.
-
Sky UK Ltd t/a NOW
A website ad for NOW TV omitted material information about the inclusion of ads in basic streaming membership plans.
-
WHG (International) Ltd t/a William Hill Online
A paid-for search ad and a website for William Hill advertising a new customer welcome bonus misled consumers by failing to include all significant conditions of the promotion and by not positioning the conditions prominently.
-
GB Sports Advisors Ltd t/a Geoff Banks Online
A website ad offering a free bet failed to include all the significant conditions of the promotion.
-
Festival Free Bets
A post on Astrid Wett’s X (formerly Twitter) page, advertising a company that collated betting offers, broke gambling ad rules by featuring someone under 25.
-
Prettylittlething.com Ltd t/a Prettylittlething.com
A series of tweets misleadingly implied that a promotion included all product lines, failed to include the closing dates or times of the promotion and misleadingly implied that further discounts would not be available when the promotion ended.
-
ProgressPlay Ltd
A website advertising a gambling promotion failed to disclose significant conditions of entry.
-
Postcode Lottery Ltd t/a People's Postcode Lottery
A TV ad for the Postcode Lottery featuring Emma Willis was not likely to be of strong appeal to under-18s.
-
Whitbread Group plc t/a Premier Inn, Beefeater
A paid-for search ad made misleading claims about the price of hotel rooms.
-
LeoVegas Gaming plc t/a Bet MGM
A TV ad for Bet MGM featuring Chris Rock was not likely to be of strong appeal to under-18s.
-
Lindar Media Ltd t/a MRQ.com
A paid-for Facebook ad for gaming website MrQ.com featured cartoon imagery that was likely to be of strong appeal to under-18s.
-
Jumpman Gaming Ltd t/a Lights Camera Bingo
A TV ad for Lucky Cow Bingo did not feature content that was likely to be of strong appeal to under-18s.
-
LeoVegas Gaming plc t/a BetUK
A radio ad for BetUK featuring Adebayo Akinfenwa was likely to be of strong appeal to under-18s.
-
Lenovo Technology (UK) Ltd
An email contained the misleading claim “Get 10% off any product”.
-
Space NK Ltd t/a Space.NK
A competition via an Instagram post did not award a prize in accordance with change, was not administered fairly and omitted significant conditions.
-
Witcombe Festival
A competition via Instagram post didn’t award the winner the promised prize or a reasonable equivalent.
-
HJ Heinz Foods UK Ltd t/a Heinz
A packaging promotion for ‘free days out’ omitted significant conditions.
-
Happytiger ApS
A TV ad for bingo featured someone who appeared to be under the age of 25.
-
Buzz Group Ltd
A post on Buzz Bingo’s Facebook page contained imagery that was likely to appeal strongly to under-18s.
-
Britvic Soft Drinks Ltd t/a Britvic
-
Florette UK Ltd
-
WHG (International) Ltd t/a William Hill Online
-
Digital Adventures Ltd t/a Free Bingo Genie, Strike Wild
-
Vintage Trading Solutions Ltd t/a Vintage Cash Cow
-
X-Clusive Competitions Ltd
-
AG Communications Ltd
-
Benefex Ltd
-
Spotlight Sports Group Ltd.