Rulings (19)
  • Wild Cosmetics Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Internet
    • 24 July 2024

    A pre-roll YouTube ad for Wild deodorant misleadingly implied that there was a link between competing deodorant products and breast cancer.

  • Lyma Life Ltd

    • Upheld
    • 26 June 2024

    A paid-for Instagram ad for an at home beauty device misleadingly claimed that it was the ‘world’s most powerful home beauty device’ and that it was a hundred times more effective and powerful than competitors’ devices.

  • Fussy Ltd

    • Upheld
    • 19 June 2024

    Fussy Ltd: A LinkedIn and Instagram ad for Fussy deodorant discredited and denigrated a competitor's brand and products.  

  • Future Farm Plant-Based Food UK Ltd t/a Future Farm

    • Upheld
    • Packaging
    • 29 May 2024

    The product packaging for a Future Farm Future Burger, seen on 9 February 2024, featured a promotion. Text on the front of the packaging stated, “WIN £1000 BUY ME AND SCAN TO ENTER *T&C’S APPLY”. A QR code was in the centre of the text.

  • Hismile Pty Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 03 April 2024

    Two paid-for TikTok ads made misleading claims about the range of flavours produced and sold by the advertiser.

  • Sparks Information PTE Ltd t/a Hunting Sniper

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 03 April 2024

    A paid-for Facebook ad for Hunting Sniper, a mobile app game, featured realistic footage of harm to animals, which was likely to cause widespread offence and unjustified distress.

  • BPerfect Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)
    • 06 March 2024

    A TikTok video on Stephanie Vavron’s account was not obviously identifiable as an ad.

  • Vir Health Ltd t/a Numan

    • Upheld
    • Television
    • 06 March 2024

    A TV ad for a hair loss treatment guaranteed the efficacy of the product, breaking the Code.

  • Coty UK Ltd t/a Coty UK Ltd

    • Upheld
    • 20 December 2023

    A paid-for Facebook ad for Rimmel London, seen on 9 September 2023, included the caption “Get ready to slay this back to school season [books emoji] [stars emoji] Get 25% off Multi-Tasker Concealer and other Rimmel faves with code B2S25 only at lookfantastic.com”. The post included a video of influencer ...

  • REVIV UK Ltd t/a REVIV

    • Upheld
    • 20 December 2023

    The website for REVIV UK, www.revivme.com/london, seen 1 April 2019, stated on the main page for its London clinic “REVIV IV infusion therapies deliver hydration, vitamins, and antioxidants helping to optimise vital hydration balance and maximise your wellness & efficiency. Whether looking to boost your immun...

  • Golden Tanning Salon Ltd t/a Golden Tanning Salon

    • Upheld
    • Social media (own site)
    • 13 December 2023

    A TikTok post linked health claims to using a tanning bed, which was misleading, irresponsible and inappropriately targeted.

  • Person(s) unknown

    • Upheld
    • Social media (own site)
    • 13 December 2023

    A TikTok post misleadingly and irresponsibly linked health claims to using a tanning bed, discouraged seeking essential treatment for conditions where medical supervision should be sought, and was inappropriately targeted.

  • Procter & Gamble UK t/a Always

    • Upheld
    • Television
    • 29 November 2023

    A TV ad for Always Discreet incontinence pads did not compare the product to the most appropriate version from the leading brand, and contained on-screen text whose placement misleading implied that 95% of women surveyed preferred the Always Discreet pad to the maxi pad from the leading brand.

  • D&A Cosmetics Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)
    • 22 November 2023

    A TikTok post on Aimee Crowder’s account exaggerated the efficacy of a lip plumper.

  • TJC & BLC Aesthetics Clinic & Training Academy

    • Upheld
    • Social media (own site)
    • 08 November 2023

    A Facebook post misleadingly did not make clear the nature, requirements, qualifications and possible registration details of a course, and contained the claims that the course was “Fully Accredited”, which could not be substantiated.

  • The Feel Good Group Ltd t/a The Tanning Shop

    • Not upheld
    • Television
    • 13 September 2023

    A TV ad for The Tanning Shop did not encourage the irresponsible use of UV tanning equipment.

  • People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) Foundation t/a PETA

    • Not upheld
    • Poster
    • 23 August 2023

    A billboard for PETA was unlikely to cause serious or widespread offence and was responsibly targeted.

  • FancyDrops Co

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 09 August 2023

    A paid-for Facebook post for an online retailer of cosmetic eye products misleadingly claimed that the eye drops could change the colour of eyes.

  • Booksy UK Ltd t/a Booksy

    • Upheld
    • App (own claim)
    • 02 August 2023

    Recommended venue listings on the Booksy app were not obviously identifiable as ads

Informally resolved (3)
  • L'Oréal (UK) Ltd

    • 17 July 2024
    • Number of complaints: 0

    Topic: Beauty products, grooming and hygiene

  • Cosmetic Medical Advice UK Ltd.

    • 05 June 2024
    • Number of complaints: 1

    Topic: Beauty products, grooming and hygiene

  • L'Oréal (UK) Ltd

    • 05 June 2024
    • Number of complaints: 1

    Topic: Beauty products, grooming and hygiene