Rulings (50)
  • Vodafone Ltd t/a Voxi, vodafone

    • Upheld
    • 18 September 2024

    A TV ad, paid-for X ad and website for Vodafone made unsubstantiated claims that their broadband services provided a nearly identical performance to BT's services, and that millions of BT broadband customers had already switched, or were actively considering switching, to Vodafone.

  • Aston Manor Ltd t/a Crumpton Oaks

    • Not upheld
    • Television
    • 14 August 2024

    A TV ad for Crumpton Oaks Cider was not likely to strongly appeal to under 18s.

  • Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd t/a Virgin Atlantic

    • Upheld
    • Radio
    • 07 August 2024

    A radio ad for Virgin Atlantic included the unqualified claim "100% sustainable aviation fuel", which gave a misleading impression of the fuel's environmental impact.

  • The Benenden Healthcare Society Ltd

    • Upheld
    • 24 July 2024

    A TV and Radio ad for private health insurance mislead consumers by omitting material information about a healthcare plan, including significant exclusions relating to treatment options.

  • FL19 CIC t/a Frontline 19

    • Not upheld
    • Cinema
    • 17 July 2024

    A cinema ad for a non-profit support service wasn't irresponsible and did not cause unjustifiable distress.

  • Spectrum Awakening

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 03 July 2024

    A paid-for Facebook ad made claims that a supplement could help to prevent, treat or cure developmental language disorder, autism and ADHD.

  • Alzheimer's Society

    • Not Upheld
    • 05 June 2024

    Three TV ads and a radio ad for a charity were not irresponsible, did not cause serious or widespread offence, and did not cause unjustifiable distress.

  • iVape London Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Email
    • 05 June 2024

    An email broke the rules by directly promoting to consumers unlicensed nicotine-containing e-cigarettes and their components.

  • Sony Interactive Entertainment Network Europe Ltd t/a PlaySation

    • Not upheld
    • 22 May 2024

    An ad for 'Call of Duty Modern Warfare III' was not irresponsibly targeted.

  • Postcode Lottery Ltd t/a People's Postcode Lottery

    • Not upheld
    • Television
    • 01 May 2024

    A TV ad for the Postcode Lottery featuring Emma Willis was not likely to be of strong appeal to under-18s.

  • infirst Ltd t/a Flarin

    • Television
    • 17 April 2024

    A TV ad misleadingly implied that Flarin was better for treating joint pain than other ibuprofen products.

  • John Mills Ltd t/a JML Direct

    • Upheld
    • Television
    • 03 April 2024

    A TV ad featured a testimonial which misleadingly implied a heated drying pod could prevent condensation form forming.

  • Mous Products Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Television
    • 03 April 2024

    A TV ad made misleading claims about the efficacy of a range of phone cases.

  • Nationwide Building Society t/a Nationwide

    • Upheld
    • Press general, Television, Radio
    • 03 April 2024

    TV, radio and press ads for Nationwide were misleading as consumers were likely to understand that the building society had made a long-term decision not to close their branches and that they had not recently closed any branches when this was not the case.

  • Sparks Information PTE Ltd t/a Hunting Sniper

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 03 April 2024

    A paid-for Facebook ad for Hunting Sniper, a mobile app game, featured realistic footage of harm to animals, which was likely to cause widespread offence and unjustified distress.

  • John Mills Ltd t/a JML Direct

    • Upheld
    • Television
    • 27 March 2024

    A TV ad for a cleaning tool presented gender stereotypes in a way that was likely to cause harm.

  • DUSK (Retail) Ltd

    • Not upheld
    • Television
    • 20 March 2024

    A TV ad was not likely to cause serious or widespread offence over its portrayal of men.

  • Hing Fo International Ltd t/a ALFABAR

    • Upheld in part
    • Poster
    • 20 March 2024

    A poster for an electronic cigarettes brand was irresponsible for being likely to appeal particularly to under-18s, but was not inappropriately targeted. 

  • LeoVegas Gaming plc t/a Bet MGM

    • Not upheld
    • Television
    • 20 March 2024

    A TV ad for Bet MGM featuring Chris Rock was not likely to be of strong appeal to under-18s.

  • Lindar Media Ltd t/a MRQ.com

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 20 March 2024

    A paid-for Facebook ad for gaming website MrQ.com featured cartoon imagery that was likely to be of strong appeal to under-18s.

Informally resolved (5)
  • ITV Broadcasting Ltd t/a ITV1, ITV Hub, ITVX

    • 28 August 2024
    • Number of complaints: 1

    Topic: Holidays, travel and motoring

  • Vintage Trading Solutions Ltd t/a Vintage Cash Cow

    • 28 August 2024
    • Number of complaints: 1

    Topic: Gambling

  • Build Hollywood Ltd

    • 21 August 2024
    • Number of complaints: 0

    Media: Poster
    Topic: Alcohol

  • Kentucky Fried Chicken (Great Britain) Ltd t/a KFC

    • 24 July 2024
    • Number of complaints: 0

    Topic: Food, drink and supplements

  • Gemporia Ltd

    • 17 July 2024
    • Number of complaints: 0