Latest news
-
Getting the job done: getting your ads for employment opportunities right
- CAP News
- 07 July 2021
-
Contacting Multi-level Marketing companies to ensure recruitment ads aren't misleading
- ASA News
- 10 June 2021
-
How to #boss multi-level-marketing ads with these top tips
- CAP News
- 10 June 2021
-
Recruiting for four people for the Advertising Advisory Committee (AAC)
- ASA and CAP News
- 28 February 2021
-
Making sure your employment ads are a job well done
- CAP News
- 30 July 2020
-
A quick guide to employment ads
- CAP News
- 07 January 2016
Latest rulings
-
Indeed Inc
- Not upheld
- Television
- 20 July 2022
A television ad did not include or promote any harmful gender stereotypes .
-
CV-Library Ltd
- Upheld
- Website (own site)
- 15 December 2021
An ad on a job vacancy website was banned for implying an employer was based in a geographical location when that was not the case.
-
JD Recruitment Group Ltd
- Upheld
- Social media (own site)
- 15 December 2021
A post on recruiter JD Recruitment's Facebook page was banned for being likely to cause serious offence on the grounds of race and for objectifying women.
-
Uber BV
- Upheld
- National newspaper (paid ad), App (paid ad)
- 15 December 2021
A paid-for ad on The Economist app and a national press ad for Uber were banned for misleadingly implying that benefits which all operators were required to provide were unique to them.