Cookies policy statement
We are using cookies on our site to provide you with the best user experience.
Disabling cookies may prevent our website from working efficiently. Click ok to remove this message (we will remember your choice).
OK

ASA Adjudication on sit-up Ltd

sit-up Ltd t/a bid tv

Unit 11 Acton Park Industrial Estate
Eastman Road
Acton
London
W3 7QE

Date:

9 January 2013

Media:

Television

Sector:

Retail

Number of complaints:

1

Complaint Ref:

A12-210342

Background

Summary of Council decision:

Two issues were investigated, both of which were Upheld.

Ad

A teleshopping presentation for a perfume included on-screen text which stated "Chopard Cascade 50ml EDP Spray". The presenter stated, "This is their brand spanking new perfume, it's only just been launched and if my memory serves me correct I think it was about 16 or 18 weeks ago in Harrods and as far as we are aware this is only sold in Harrods ... God knows how we've got it but we have, we've got our hand on it".

Issue

The complainant challenged whether the ad misleadingly implied that:

1. the only other retailer selling the product was Harrods; and

2. the product had recently been launched.

BCAP Code

Response

sit-up Ltd t/a Bid TV (sit-up) stated that their buyer believed the sheer volume of fragrances running through the business at this time of year had resulted in an error being made in relation to the original date of release of the perfume and its availability at other outlets. They said that at the time of release the perfume was only available at Harrods but accepted that it had actually been launched in 2009 and that it was now more widely available. They said that the presentation had been modified and that the relevant information would be passed on to other hosts.

Assessment

Upheld

The ASA welcomed the changes that had been made to prevent similar claims in future presentations. We considered that consumers would understand the claims in the presentation to mean that the perfume had been launched in 2012 and, other than through Bid TV, the product was only available at Harrods. Because this was not the case, we concluded that the ad was misleading.

The ad breached BCAP Code rules 3.1 (Misleading advertising), 3.9 (Substantiation) and 3.32 (Availability).

Action

The ad should not appear again in its current form. We told sit-up Ltd not to make availability claims without holding robust evidence.

Follow Us

For ASA news, including our weekly rulings, press releases, research and reports.
 

How to comply with the rules

For advice and training on the Advertising Codes please visit the CAP website.

Make a complaint

Find out what types of ads we deal with and how to make a complaint.

Press Zone

This section is for journalists only. Here you will be able to access embargoed material, breaking news and briefing papers as well as profile details for the ASA press office.