Rulings (261)
  • Supreme CBD Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (own site)
    • 29 October 2025

    A post for SupremeCBD on Anthony Fowler’s Instagram account implied that a food supplement could prevent, treat or cure chronic anxiety and depression. It also discouraged essential treatment for conditions for which medical supervision should be sought.

  • Sweet Bee Organics Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 29 October 2025

    A website for a beauty products retailer made medicinal claims about an unlicensed product.

  • WHG (International) Ltd t/a William Hill Online

    • Upheld
    • App (own claim)
    • 29 October 2025

    An in-app ad promoting an offer for a game in the William Hill app misleadingly contradicted the terms and conditions that applied to the offer.

  • Betway Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 22 October 2025

    A pre-roll ad on YouTube for Betway featured the Chelsea FC logo in a manner which was likely to be of strong appeal to under-18s.

  • Bonne Terre Ltd t/a Sky Bet

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 22 October 2025

    [Republished ruling] A promoted tweet for Sky Bet featured Gary Neville, a person who was likely to be of strong appeal to under-18s.

  • Eaton Gate Gaming Ltd t/a Kwiff

    • Upheld
    • Social media (own site)
    • 22 October 2025

    A post on Kwiff’s X account featured Sir Lewis Hamilton, a person who was likely to be of strong appeal to under-18s.

  • Assured Food Standards t/a Red Tractor

    • Upheld
    • Television
    • 15 October 2025

    A TV ad for Assured Food Standard’s Red Tractor Scheme failed to make clear exactly which standards it was referring to, or the degree to which those standards were being met when using the claim “farmed with care” in conjunction with “all our standards are met.”

  • Charlie Johnson

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 15 October 2025

    Two paid-for social media ads by Charlie Johnson, a business coach in the fitness industry, misleadingly implied that claimed lifestyle and earning results were typical and that a promotion was time limited when this wasn’t the case.

  • Grant Cardone Training Technologies Inc t/a Grant Cardone

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 15 October 2025

    A paid-for Facebook ad for an online business event by businessman Grant Cardone misleadingly implied that claimed earnings results were typical.

  • HW Fantasy Ltd t/a My Passion

    • Upheld
    • In-game (apps)
    • 15 October 2025

    An in-game ad for an online romantic novel service, seen in a puzzle game was socially irresponsible and likely to cause serious and widespread offence, including by trivialising violence against women.

  • Jessica Crane Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad), Website (own site)
    • 15 October 2025

    A paid-for Facebook and Instagram ad for a wealth and business coach company, run by Jessica Crane, misleadingly implied that lifestyle and earnings results were typical, misled in relation to the content of training material available for free and made unsubstantiated claims about the number of top salon owners using ...

  • Procter & Gamble UK t/a Ariel

    • Upheld
    • Television
    • 15 October 2025

    A TV ad for Ariel laundry pods made an unsubstantiated claim that their product was as effective at cleaning clothes as other products, or when used in combination with laundry additives, and made unverifiable comparisons with identifiable competitors.

  • Robbins Research International Inc t/a Tony Robbins

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 15 October 2025

    A paid-for Facebook post by Tony Robbins advertising a business coaching course misleadingly implied that claimed earnings results were typical.

  • Self Made Girl Boss Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 15 October 2025

    A paid-for Instagram post for a business coaching company, misleadingly implied that stated lifestyle and earning results were typical, included qualifications that contradicted the claims that they qualified, and failed to make the distinction between free and priced items clear.

  • Community Fibre Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 08 October 2025

    Two pages on the Community Fibre website misleadingly implied that they were the number one rated for internet provider and that they had the most 5 star reviews on third party website. 

  • Hammonds Furniture Ltd t/a Hammonds

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 08 October 2025

    A banner ad and a page on the Hammonds Furniture website, misleadingly implied that discount offers were time limited and also made unsubstantiated and unverifiable comparative claims with identifiable competitors.

  • BCCR Ltd t/a Belief Coding Cognitive Rewiring

    • Upheld
    • Social media (own site)
    • 01 October 2025

    Two posts on Jessica Cunningham’s Facebook page advertising belief coding discouraged essential treatment for conditions for which medical supervision should be sought and made unsubstantiated claims for the efficacy of belief coding in treating health conditions.

  • Shell Energy UK

    • Not Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 01 October 2025

    A paid-for LinkedIn ad for Shell Energy didn't give a misleading impression of the overall environmental impact of Shell’s business activities.

  • Au Vodka Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad), Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)
    • 24 September 2025

    A TikTok post by influencer Lucinda Strafford, a paid-for Facebook post featuring influencer Kai Cenat and another paid-for Facebook post advertising AU Vodka were inappropriately targeted, directed at under-18s and featured people who were, or appeared to be, under-25.

  • Currys Group Ltd t/a Currys

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 24 September 2025

    A paid-for Facebook ad for Currys was misleading and socially irresponsible by implying that e-scooters could be ridden on public roads.

Informally resolved (1)
  • Toolport GmbH t/a House of Tents

    • 06 November 2024
    • Number of complaints: 1

    Topic: Home and garden