Rulings (32)
  • Activision Blizzard UK Ltd t/a Call of Duty

    • Upheld in part
    • Social media (paid ad), Video on demand
    • 18 February 2026

    A Video on Demand and YouTube ad for Call of Duty: Black Ops 7 was socially irresponsible and likely to cause serious offence by trivialising sexual violence. Another issue was investigated but it didn’t break the rules.

  • FlyDogGame t/a Love and Peace

    • Upheld
    • App (paid ad)
    • 18 February 2026

    A paid-for ad for a mobile game app was socially irresponsible and likely to cause serious or widespread offence, including by trivialising and condoning violence, including domestic violence.

  • Pocket FM Private Ltd

    • Upheld
    • App (paid ad)
    • 18 February 2026

    A paid-for in-app ad for an audiobook app was socially irresponsible and likely to cause serious or widespread offence, including by referencing sexual assault and sexual violence.

  • Skywork AI Pte t/a Dramawave

    • Upheld
    • App (paid ad)
    • 18 February 2026

    A video ad for a streaming platform was socially irresponsible and likely to cause serious or widespread offence, including by featuring content that was sexually explicit and suggested sexual violence.

  • Haikou Chengfa Technology Co Ltd t/a Aurai Ai

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 11 February 2026

    A paid-for YouTube ad for an AI role play app was socially irresponsible and likely to cause serious and widespread offence, including by featuring expletives and content that condoned sexually violent behaviour.

  • persons unknown t/a Animals Solitaire: Protect

    • Upheld
    • In-game (apps)
    • 04 February 2026

    An in-game ad for a mobile game app was socially irresponsible and likely to cause serious or widespread offence, including by objectifying and sexualising women and featuring a harmful gender stereotype.

  • Dreame International Hong Kong Ltd t/a Stary PTE Ltd

    • Upheld
    • App (own claim)
    • 28 January 2026

    Two in-app ads for a romantic fiction app were socially irresponsible and likely to cause serious and widespread offence including by trivialising or condoning violence against women and girls and featuring sexually explicit content. The ads also were irresponsibly targeted.

  • Cult Wines Ltd

    • Upheld
    • 24 December 2025

    A website page for a wine investment company made misleading claims about investment returns. The ad also failed to make clear that wine investment was unregulated, that the value of investments was variable and that examples of past performance...

  • Pernod Ricard UK Ltd t/a Absolut

    • Not upheld
    • Poster
    • 10 December 2025

    Digital escalator panels, posters and vinyl wall displays for Absolut Vodka were unlikely to particularly appeal to under-18s.

  • Banquist Ltd t/a Winedrops

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad), Email
    • 05 November 2025

    Two emails and a paid-for Instagram ad for an online wine retailer made misleading and unsubstantiated claims about the origin of their wine. They also failed to make clear the basis of the price comparisons and the significant conditions of the promotion.

  • persons unknown t/a Arthur Mystery Book

    • Upheld
    • In-game (apps)
    • 05 November 2025

    An in-game ad for a mobile game app was socially irresponsible and likely to cause serious and widespread offence by objectifying and sexualising women and featuring a harmful gender stereotype. 

  • HW Fantasy Ltd t/a My Passion

    • Upheld
    • In-game (apps)
    • 15 October 2025

    An in-game ad for an online romantic novel service, seen in a puzzle game was socially irresponsible and likely to cause serious and widespread offence, including by trivialising violence against women.

  • Au Vodka Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad), Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)
    • 24 September 2025

    A TikTok post by influencer Lucinda Strafford, a paid-for Facebook post featuring influencer Kai Cenat and another paid-for Facebook post advertising AU Vodka were inappropriately targeted, directed at under-18s and featured people who were, or appeared to be, under-25.

  • Voodoo Doll Ltd t/a MOJO Manchester

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 24 September 2025

    A paid-for Meta ad for a bar, which referenced alcoholic drinks, was irresponsible by being likely to have particular appeal to under-18s and by encouraging excessive drinking.

  • Gorgeous Shard Puzzle Studio

    • Upheld
    • In-game (apps)
    • 17 September 2025

    An in-game ad for a mobile game app was socially irresponsible and likely to cause serious and widespread offence, including by objectifying and sexualising women and featuring a harmful gender stereotype.

  • Heineken UK Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)
    • 10 September 2025

    An Instagram post by the comedian Al Nash advertising Strongbow, implied that alcohol was indispensable and took priority in life.

  • Mast-Jagermeister UK t/a Jägermeister

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 10 September 2025

    Two paid-for Facebook and Instagram ads for Jägermeister were socially irresponsible and implied that alcohol was a key component of the success of a social event.

  • CTW Inc

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 27 August 2025

    Three paid-for YouTube ads for a video-game company were socially irresponsible, likely to cause serious or widespread offence and featured harmful gender stereotypes by objectifying and sexualising women. The ads also portrayed someone who appeared to be under 18 in a sexual way.

  • Locksley Distilling Co Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 27 August 2025

    A paid-for Facebook and Instagram ad for a bottle of gin implied that a drink may be preferred because of its higher alcohol content.

  • BrewDog plc

    • Upheld
    • Poster
    • 06 August 2025

    A poster broke the strict alcohol advertising rules because it implied that alcohol could overcome boredom, loneliness or other problems.