Rulings (35)
  • linyixiansanrenwangluokejiyouxiangongsi t/a IDJRDDF

    • Upheld
    • Website (commercial classified)
    • 27 May 2026

    A product listing on Amazon featured a gender stereotype that was likely to cause harm or serious offence. 

  • Perrin Et Fils SAS t/a La Vieille Ferme

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 20 May 2026

    A paid-for TikTok ad for a wine company irresponsibly implied that alcohol had therapeutic qualities, portrayed alcohol as being capable of changing your mood and a source of nourishment and made health claims. The ad was also socially irresponsible by encouraging excessive drinking.

  • VAM Apps Co t/a The Coach

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 20 May 2026

     A paid-for YouTube ad for a men’s health app was likely to cause serious and widespread offence. 

  • Bestway Retail Ltd t/a Bargain Booze

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 06 May 2026

    A paid-for Facebook ad for an alcohol retailer irresponsibly implied that alcohol could overcome loneliness. 

  • Sazerac UK Ltd t/a Hi-Spirits

    • Upheld
    • Poster
    • 01 April 2026

    A poster for an alcoholic drink was socially irresponsible by encouraging excessive drinking.

  • DrinkWell Beverages Ltd t/a Drinkwell

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 25 March 2026

    A paid-for Meta ad for an online alcohol retailer misleadingly implied a drink may be preferred due to its alcohol content and made non-permitted health and nutrition claims about alcoholic drinks.

  • Mark Anthony Brands (UK) Ltd t/a White Claw UK

    • Upheld
    • Social media (own site)
    • 25 March 2026

    An Instagram Highlight on White Claw UK’s page, an alcohol brand, featured three Stories showing individuals who appeared to be under 25, breaching the alcohol advertising rules.

  • Saeta Tech Ltd t/a PixVideo – AI Video Maker

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 18 March 2026

    A paid-for YouTube ad for an AI video maker which condoned digitally altering and exposing women’s bodies without their consent, was irresponsible, included a harmful gender stereotype and was likely to cause serious offence.

  • Activision Blizzard UK Ltd t/a Call of Duty

    • Upheld in part
    • Social media (paid ad), Video on demand
    • 18 February 2026

    A Video on Demand and YouTube ad for Call of Duty: Black Ops 7 was socially irresponsible and likely to cause serious offence by trivialising sexual violence. Another issue was investigated but it didn’t break the rules.

  • FlyDogGame t/a Love and Peace

    • Upheld
    • App (paid ad)
    • 18 February 2026

    A paid-for ad for a mobile game app was socially irresponsible and likely to cause serious or widespread offence, including by trivialising and condoning violence, including domestic violence.

  • Pocket FM Private Ltd

    • Upheld
    • App (paid ad)
    • 18 February 2026

    A paid-for in-app ad for an audiobook app was socially irresponsible and likely to cause serious or widespread offence, including by referencing sexual assault and sexual violence.

  • Skywork AI Pte t/a Dramawave

    • Upheld
    • App (paid ad)
    • 18 February 2026

    A video ad for a streaming platform was socially irresponsible and likely to cause serious or widespread offence, including by featuring content that was sexually explicit and suggested sexual violence.

  • Haikou Chengfa Technology Co Ltd t/a Aurai Ai

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 11 February 2026

    A paid-for YouTube ad for an AI role play app was socially irresponsible and likely to cause serious and widespread offence, including by featuring expletives and content that condoned sexually violent behaviour.

  • persons unknown t/a Animals Solitaire: Protect

    • Upheld
    • In-game (apps)
    • 04 February 2026

    An in-game ad for a mobile game app was socially irresponsible and likely to cause serious or widespread offence, including by objectifying and sexualising women and featuring a harmful gender stereotype.

  • Dreame International Hong Kong Ltd t/a Stary PTE Ltd

    • Upheld
    • App (own claim)
    • 28 January 2026

    Two in-app ads for a romantic fiction app were socially irresponsible and likely to cause serious and widespread offence including by trivialising or condoning violence against women and girls and featuring sexually explicit content. The ads also were irresponsibly targeted.

  • Cult Wines Ltd

    • Upheld
    • 24 December 2025

    A website page for a wine investment company made misleading claims about investment returns. The ad also failed to make clear that wine investment was unregulated, that the value of investments was variable and that examples of past performance...

  • Pernod Ricard UK Ltd t/a Absolut

    • Not upheld
    • Poster
    • 10 December 2025

    Digital escalator panels, posters and vinyl wall displays for Absolut Vodka were unlikely to particularly appeal to under-18s.

  • Banquist Ltd t/a Winedrops

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad), Email
    • 05 November 2025

    Two emails and a paid-for Instagram ad for an online wine retailer made misleading and unsubstantiated claims about the origin of their wine. They also failed to make clear the basis of the price comparisons and the significant conditions of the promotion.

  • persons unknown t/a Arthur Mystery Book

    • Upheld
    • In-game (apps)
    • 05 November 2025

    An in-game ad for a mobile game app was socially irresponsible and likely to cause serious and widespread offence by objectifying and sexualising women and featuring a harmful gender stereotype. 

  • HW Fantasy Ltd t/a My Passion

    • Upheld
    • In-game (apps)
    • 15 October 2025

    An in-game ad for an online romantic novel service, seen in a puzzle game was socially irresponsible and likely to cause serious and widespread offence, including by trivialising violence against women.