Rulings (49)
  • GoBrands Euro Intermediate Holdings SARL t/a gopuff

    • Upheld in part
    • Website (own site)
    • 09 July 2025

    A website for a Grocery delivery service which was promoting an ‘Aldi Price Match’ implied that all non-optional fees were included in the price match when this wasn’t the case, but didn’t present pricing information in a misleading way.

  • PepsiCo International Ltd t/a Lipton Tea

    • Upheld
    • Social media (own site)
    • 09 July 2025

    An Instagram and TikTok post by Lipton Ice Tea misleadingly gave the impression that the Peach Lipton Ice Tea was being discontinued.

  • Good Guru Ltd t/a Protein World

    • Upheld
    • Email
    • 02 July 2025

    An email made claims that a food could treat anorexia.

  • Mondelez UK Ltd t/a Cadbury

    • Upheld
    • Radio
    • 02 July 2025

    A radio ad made nutrition and comparative nutrition claims that didn’t meet the conditions of use for those claims.

  • CLF Distribution Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Email
    • 11 June 2025

    An email misleadingly claimed that products only contained “naturally sweet ingredients”.

  • UAB Convenity t/a Huusk

    • Upheld
    • 28 May 2025

    A TV ad for Huusk Knives was irresponsibly scheduled. 

  • Viva Research Ltd t/a Vivanmn

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 28 May 2025

    Two paid-for Facebook ads claimed that a food supplement could treat or cure ADHD, made medicinal claims for an unlicensed product and made unauthorised specific health claims. 

  • air up GmbH

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 28 May 2025

    A paid-for TikTok ad was irresponsible and likely to cause serious or widespread offense.

  • ZOE Ltd t/a Zoe

    • Upheld
    • 21 May 2025

    A paid-for Facebook ad misleadingly claimed that a supplement didn't contain any ultra-processed ingredients.

  • Cloud Whale Interactive Technology

    • Upheld
    • In-game (apps)
    • 07 May 2025

    An in-game ad was socially irresponsible, likely to cause serious or widespread offence and was irresponsibly targeted

  • Dualit Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Search (paid)
    • 30 April 2025

    A paid-for search ad misleadingly implied that coffee bags could be composted at home when this wasn't the case. 

  • Lavazza Coffee (UK) Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Search (paid)
    • 30 April 2025

    A paid-for search ad misleadingly implied that coffee pods could be composted at home when this wasn't the case.

  • Belle Baby Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 09 April 2025

    A website, which featured a product listing for a swimsuit, included an image of a child portrayed in a sexual way.

  • McDonald's Restaurants Ltd

    • Upheld in part
    • App (own claim), Television
    • 26 March 2025

    An ad for the ‘Feed the Family Offer’ shown in the My McDonald’s app failed to include all non-optional fees in quoted prices.

  • Shenzhenshi Senyi Dianzi Shangwu Youxiangongsi t/a Plum-Marketing

    • Upheld
    • Internet (classified)
    • 12 March 2025

    An Amazon product listing was socially irresponsible as it condoned an unsafe practice and featured very young children playing with a toy that was likely to cause them physical harm. 

  • Supplylife Group Ltd t/a SUPPLYlife

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 19 February 2025

    A website misleadingly stated that, informed by their testing, an elimination diet could help food related energy dips, unwanted weight and IBS or its symptoms.

  • INSTITUTO NATURVITA S.L. t/a Natur Vital

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 12 February 2025

    A webpage misleadingly and irresponsibly implied that hair colourants were safe for people with an allergy to PPD.

  • Next Retail Ltd t/a NEXT

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 12 February 2025

    A product listing on the NEXT website irresponsibly portrayed a model as being unhealthily thin.

  • Visual Stress Consultancy Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 29 January 2025

    A website made unsubstantiated claims that tinted glasses could be used for driving at night and condoned unsafe driving.   

  • Health Line

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 22 January 2025

    Two paid-for Facebook ads misleadingly exaggerated the capabilities of laser eye treatment, falsely implied that they directly provided laser eye treatment themselves and didn't make clear that they received a commission for their service. 

Informally resolved (1)
  • Kentucky Fried Chicken (Great Britain) Ltd t/a KFC

    • 24 July 2024
    • Number of complaints: 0

    Topic: Food, drink and supplements