-
GoBrands Euro Intermediate Holdings SARL t/a gopuff
A website for a Grocery delivery service which was promoting an ‘Aldi Price Match’ implied that all non-optional fees were included in the price match when this wasn’t the case, but didn’t present pricing information in a misleading way.
-
PepsiCo International Ltd t/a Lipton Tea
An Instagram and TikTok post by Lipton Ice Tea misleadingly gave the impression that the Peach Lipton Ice Tea was being discontinued.
-
Good Guru Ltd t/a Protein World
An email made claims that a food could treat anorexia.
-
Mondelez UK Ltd t/a Cadbury
A radio ad made nutrition and comparative nutrition claims that didn’t meet the conditions of use for those claims.
-
CLF Distribution Ltd
An email misleadingly claimed that products only contained “naturally sweet ingredients”.
-
UAB Convenity t/a Huusk
A TV ad for Huusk Knives was irresponsibly scheduled.
-
Viva Research Ltd t/a Vivanmn
Two paid-for Facebook ads claimed that a food supplement could treat or cure ADHD, made medicinal claims for an unlicensed product and made unauthorised specific health claims.
-
air up GmbH
A paid-for TikTok ad was irresponsible and likely to cause serious or widespread offense.
-
ZOE Ltd t/a Zoe
A paid-for Facebook ad misleadingly claimed that a supplement didn't contain any ultra-processed ingredients.
-
Cloud Whale Interactive Technology
An in-game ad was socially irresponsible, likely to cause serious or widespread offence and was irresponsibly targeted
-
Dualit Ltd
A paid-for search ad misleadingly implied that coffee bags could be composted at home when this wasn't the case.
-
Lavazza Coffee (UK) Ltd
A paid-for search ad misleadingly implied that coffee pods could be composted at home when this wasn't the case.
-
Belle Baby Ltd
A website, which featured a product listing for a swimsuit, included an image of a child portrayed in a sexual way.
-
McDonald's Restaurants Ltd
An ad for the ‘Feed the Family Offer’ shown in the My McDonald’s app failed to include all non-optional fees in quoted prices.
-
Shenzhenshi Senyi Dianzi Shangwu Youxiangongsi t/a Plum-Marketing
An Amazon product listing was socially irresponsible as it condoned an unsafe practice and featured very young children playing with a toy that was likely to cause them physical harm.
-
Supplylife Group Ltd t/a SUPPLYlife
A website misleadingly stated that, informed by their testing, an elimination diet could help food related energy dips, unwanted weight and IBS or its symptoms.
-
INSTITUTO NATURVITA S.L. t/a Natur Vital
A webpage misleadingly and irresponsibly implied that hair colourants were safe for people with an allergy to PPD.
-
Next Retail Ltd t/a NEXT
A product listing on the NEXT website irresponsibly portrayed a model as being unhealthily thin.
-
Visual Stress Consultancy Ltd
A website made unsubstantiated claims that tinted glasses could be used for driving at night and condoned unsafe driving.
-
Health Line
Two paid-for Facebook ads misleadingly exaggerated the capabilities of laser eye treatment, falsely implied that they directly provided laser eye treatment themselves and didn't make clear that they received a commission for their service.
-
Kentucky Fried Chicken (Great Britain) Ltd t/a KFC
Topic: Food, drink and supplements