-
Health Line
Two paid-for Facebook ads misleadingly exaggerated the capabilities of laser eye treatment, falsely implied that they directly provided laser eye treatment themselves and didn't make clear that they received a commission for their service.
-
Royalux Competitions Ltd
A prize draw wasn't administered fairly and caused unnecessary disappointment.
-
The Essence Vault Ltd
A paid-for Facebook ad made misleading pricing claims.
-
Zimran Ltd t/a Zimran
A paid-for YouTube ad for an app offering financial investment training courses didn't make clear that the value of investments was variable and irresponsibly took advantage of people's lack of experience by implying that investment was straightforward and that large returns could be made with minimal time and ...
-
Endrick Clothing Ltd
Two Instagram posts were not clearly identifiable as marketing communication and portrayed smoking in an appealing manner which is against the ad rules.
-
Marren Healthcare Ltd
A website for a rehab clinic referral company falsely implied that they were acting for purposes outside their business, that they owned clinics and that local rehab centres could be accessed using their website. They also didn't make clear that they received a commission for their services.
-
Vacaciones eDreams, S.L. t/a eDreams
Two paid-for online display ads made unsubstantiated environmental claims.
-
Action Rehab
A website for a rehab clinic referral company falsely implied that they were acting for purposes outside their business, that they owned clinics and that they had been approved by a public body. It also failed to make clear that they received a commission for their service.
-
Addiction Recovery Systems Ltd t/a Rehab Guide
A website for a rehab clinic referral company falsely implied that they were acting for purposes outside their business and that they provided treatment directly at clinics they operated and also failed to make clear that they received a commission for their service.
-
Auto Finesse Ltd
An Instagram ad was socially irresponsible and caused serious offence by featuring a harmful stereotype by objectifying and sexualising women.
-
Beer52 Ltd
Two email promotions omitted significant conditions.
-
Better Health and Wellness
A paid-for Facebook ad was misleading as it didn’t make clear the nature of the content people would be served if they engaged with the ad.
-
Health and Wellness
A paid-for Facebook ad was misleading as it didn’t make clear the nature of the content people would be served if they engaged with the ad and also exaggerated the capability of laser eye treatment.
-
Heineken UK Ltd t/a Heineken
A paid-for online display ad for Heineken 0.0 didn’t include a prominent statement of ABV.
-
Help 4 Addiction Ltd
A website for a rehab clinic referral company falsely implied that they were acting for purposes outside their business, that they provided treatment directly at clinics they operated and that a local rehab facility could be accessed using their website. It also didn’t make clear that they received commission for...
-
IT Career Change Ltd
A listing on a job vacancy website misleadingly implied they were offering genuine job vacancies.
-
Lloyds Bank plc
A paid-for LinkedIn post for Lloyds Bank was misleading as it omitted significant information about the company’s environmental impact.
-
Marketing VF Ltd t/a The Eco Experts
A paid-for Facebook ad for a laser eye surgery referral company falsely implied they were acting for purposes outside their business and that they directly provided laser eye surgery when this wasn’t the case. The ad also failed to make clear that they receive a commission for their service and misleadingly exagg...
-
Oakever Games PTE Ltd
Two in-game ads made medical claims for an unregistered device which didn’t hold the relevant compliance labels and made unsubstantiated claims that an app could improve memory and sleep.
-
Origin Sleep UK Ltd t/a Origin Mattress
A website implied that a promotion was time limited when this wasn’t the case, made misleading and unsubstantiated savings claims and made unsubstantiated claims about the health properties of their products.
-
Toolport GmbH t/a House of Tents
Topic: Home and garden
-
G.Network Communications Ltd
Media: Internet
Topic: Sports, leisure and hobbies -
Jetline Travel Ltd t/a Jetline Travel
Media: Email
Topic: Holidays, travel and motoring -
Shop Direct Home Shopping Ltd t/a Very, very.co.uk, Littlewoods, littlewoods.com
Media: Internet
Topic: Appliances, electronics and machinery -
Direct Ferries Ltd t/a Direct Ferries
Topic: Holidays, travel and motoring
-
Kentucky Fried Chicken (Great Britain) Ltd t/a KFC
Topic: Food, drink and supplements
-
Rakhee Mediratta
Topic: Medicines, remedies and therapies
-
Samsung Electronics (UK) Ltd t/a Samsung
Topic: Computers, phones and telecoms
-
We Love Holidays Ltd t/a LoveHolidays
Topic: Holidays, travel and motoring
-
GoBrands Euro Intermediate Holdings SARL t/a gopuff
Media: Internet
Topic: Vaping, smoking and drugs -
L'Oréal (UK) Ltd
Topic: Beauty products, grooming and hygiene
-
X-Clusive Competitions Ltd
Media: Internet
Topic: Gambling -
Grocery Delivery E-Services UK Ltd t/a HelloFresh
Topic: Food, drink and supplements
-
Jahangir Group Ltd t/a ShopVistaa
Topic: Health conditions
-
Roofoods Ltd t/a Deliveroo
Topic: Food, drink and supplements
-
Sophie Church t/a sophie__church
Topic: Claims, endorsements and testimonials
-
Viabl Ltd
Topic: Delivery, construction and logistics
-
Whaleco UK Ltd t/a Temu
Topic: Medical devices
-
AG Communications Ltd
Topic: Gambling
-
Air France-KLM t/a Air France
Topic: Holidays, travel and motoring