Rulings (65)
  • ContextLogic Inc t/a Wish.com

    • Upheld
    • App (paid ad), Game (mobile/app)
    • 29 July 2020

    Four in-app ads for the e-commerce platform Wish were banned for placing explicit sexual images in apps that were likely to be used by children.

  • BOXT Ltd

    • Upheld in part
    • Television, Social media (own site)
    • 15 July 2020

    A YouTube and TV ad for a BOXT boiler was banned for making misleading price comparison claims.

  • Telefonica UK Ltd t/a O2

    • Upheld
    • National press
    • 08 July 2020

    Two newspaper ads for O2 made misleading claims about the total cost of an iPad and Surface Pros.

  • LC International Limited t/a Coral

    • Upheld
    • Social media (own site)
    • 03 June 2020

    A tweet on a gambling company’s Twitter feed broke the rules by presenting a promotion in a way that was likely to encourage potentially harmful gambling behaviour.

  • LC International Ltd t/a Ladbrokes

    • Not upheld
    • Television
    • 03 June 2020

    A TV ad for a gambling company did not break the rules on encouraging gambling behaviour that was socially irresponsible or portray gambling as indispensable.

  • Grapevine Europe Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Television
    • 20 May 2020

    A TV ad for a car buying comparison site misled consumers about what personal information was needed to obtain valuations from their website.

  • Mizkan Euro Ltd t/a Branston

    • Not upheld
    • Poster
    • 13 May 2020

    A poster ad for vinegar did not condone or encourage poor nutritional habits or an unhealthy lifestyle in children.

  • Sky UK Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Television
    • 13 May 2020

    A TV ad misleadingly implied Sky offered the UK’s lowest-priced superfast broadband.

  • Boohoo.com UK Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Email, Internet (social networking)
    • 06 May 2020

    Discount claims in an email and website misleadingly implied all products would be discounted and a countdown clock on the website misleadingly implied the offers were time-limited.

  • I Saw it First Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Text Message
    • 06 May 2020

    A text message and a website for an online fashion retailer misleadingly implied a promotion was applicable to all products and that, by using a countdown clock, discount offers were time-limited.

  • MissPap Ltd t/a Misspap

    • Upheld
    • Internet (on own site), Website (own site)
    • 06 May 2020

    A website for an online fashion retailer which used a countdown clock misleadingly implied discount offers were time-limited.

  • Buy It Direct Ltd t/a Furniture123

    • Upheld
    • Internet (on own site), Website (own site)
    • 29 April 2020

    A furniture website made misleading savings claims.

  • Iceland Foods Ltd t/a Iceland

    • Not upheld
    • National press
    • 29 April 2020

    A national press ad for a supermarket did not make a misleading price comparison.

  • Hey Habito Ltd

    • Not upheld
    • Television, Video on demand
    • 22 April 2020

    A TV and VOD ad for an online mortgage broker featuring cartoon gory horror was scheduled appropriately to prevent it from likely being seen by young children.

  • ITV Broadcasting Ltd

    • Not upheld
    • Television
    • 22 April 2020

    A TV ad for a film was not scheduled inappropriately as children made up only a small proportion of the audience and it was not directed at or likely to be of particular appeal to them.

  • ITV Broadcasting Ltd

    • Not upheld
    • Television
    • 08 April 2020

    Two TV ads for a video game were not scheduled inappropriately.

  • Sky UK Ltd t/a Sky, NowTV

    • Not upheld
    • Television
    • 08 April 2020

    TV ads for a video game and a film were not scheduled inappropriately.

  • Merlin Entertainments plc

    • Not upheld
    • Internet (on own site)
    • 01 April 2020

    Claims on Alton Towers’ website that fastrack passes reduced queue times were not misleading.

  • Warners Group Publications plc

    • Upheld
    • Internet (social networking)
    • 01 April 2020

    A Facebook post for a railway magazine promoting a goody bag was banned for failing to disclose that buyers would be tied into a yearly subscription.

  • kidsfitnesstrackers

    • Upheld
    • Internet (on own site)
    • 01 April 2020

    A product listing on a website for a children’s fitbit made misleading savings claims.

Informally resolved (6)
  • Cameron Mackintosh Ltd - unconfirmed

    • 04 December 2019
    • Number of complaints: 1

    Media: Internet (on own site)
    Topic: Pricing and charges

  • Lifecycle Marketing - unconfirmed

    • 04 December 2019
    • Number of complaints: 1

    Media: Internet (sales promotion)
    Topic: Children and the vulnerable

  • Peloton Interactive UK Ltd

    • 04 December 2019
    • Number of complaints: 1

    Media: Internet (on own site), Internet (social networking), Television
    Topic: Sports, leisure and hobbies

  • Splendor SA

    • 04 December 2019
    • Number of complaints: 1

    Media: National press
    Topic: Clothing, shoes and jewellery, Pricing and charges

  • Waterstones Booksellers Ltd

    • 04 December 2019
    • Number of complaints: 1

    Media: Internet (on own site)
    Topic: Sports, leisure and hobbies

  • EMP Mail order UK Ltd

    • 14 August 2019
    • Number of complaints: 1

    Media: Internet (on own site), Internet (display)
    Topic: Pricing and charges