Rulings (34)
  • Kenvue UK Ltd t/a Listerine

    • Upheld
    • Television
    • 02 July 2025

    A TV ad misleadingly exaggerated the performance of a product.

  • Wowcher Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 02 July 2025

    A website made misleading savings claims.

  • SaffPro

    • Upheld
    • 25 June 2025

    A TikTok post and a paid-for Facebook ad made unauthorised specific health claims, claimed that a food supplement could prevent, treat or cure ADHD and irresponsibly encouraged people to stop taking medically prescribed treatments for ADHD.

  • Menwell Ltd t/a Manual

    • Upheld
    • Search (paid)
    • 04 June 2025

    A paid-for Google ad promoted a prescription-only medicine to the general public.

  • 2XU UK Limited

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 16 April 2025

    A paid-for Instagram ad for 2xu Recovery Compression Tights made medical claims without holding the applicable conformity marking and were not registered with the MHRA.

  • Dawn Hazeldine t/a Stockport Counselling Services

    • Upheld
    • Internet (website content)
    • 12 March 2025

    A webpage misleadingly claimed that they were associated with the BACP and implied that they’d received training and qualifications from them when this wasn't the case.

  • Action Rehab

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 18 December 2024

    A website for a rehab clinic referral company falsely implied that they were acting for purposes outside their business, that they owned clinics and that they had been approved by a public body. It also failed to make clear that they received a commission for their service.

  • Addiction Recovery Systems Ltd t/a Rehab Guide

    • Upheld
    • Internet (website content)
    • 18 December 2024

    A website for a rehab clinic referral company falsely implied that they were acting for purposes outside their business and that they provided treatment directly at clinics they operated and also failed to make clear that they received a commission for their service.

  • Better Health and Wellness

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 18 December 2024

    A paid-for Facebook ad was misleading as it didn’t make clear the nature of the content people would be served if they engaged with the ad.

  • Health and Wellness

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 18 December 2024

    A paid-for Facebook ad was misleading as it didn’t make clear the nature of the content people would be served if they engaged with the ad and also exaggerated the capability of laser eye treatment.

  • Help 4 Addiction Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 18 December 2024

    A website for a rehab clinic referral company falsely implied that they were acting for purposes outside their business, that they provided treatment directly at clinics they operated and that a local rehab facility could be accessed using their website. It also didn’t make clear that they received commission for...

  • Marketing VF Ltd t/a The Eco Experts

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 18 December 2024

    A paid-for Facebook ad for a laser eye surgery referral company falsely implied they were acting for purposes outside their business and that they directly provided laser eye surgery when this wasn’t the case. The ad also failed to make clear that they receive a commission for their service and misleadingly exagg...

  • Rehabs.uk

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 18 December 2024

    A website for a rehab clinic referral company falsely implied that they were acting for purposes outside their business and that they provided treatment directly at clinics they operated and also failed to make clear that they received a commission for their service.

  • Serenity Rehabilitation Ltd t/a Serenity Addiction Centres

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 18 December 2024

    A website for a rehab clinic referral company falsely implied that they were acting for purposes outside their business, that they provided treatment directly at clinics they operated and that they had been approved by a public body and also failed to make clear that they received a commission for their service.

  • UK Addiction Treatment Ltd t/a UKAT

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 18 December 2024

    A website for a rehab clinic referral company falsely implied that they were acting for purposes outside their business and misleadingly suggested that their service was impartial and that they offered professional counselling treatment.

  • Which Rehab Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 18 December 2024

    A website for a rehab clinic referral company falsely implied that they were acting for purposes outside their business, that they provided treatment directly at clinics they operated, that they had a direct relationship with insurers and that they had been approved by a public body. It also failed to make clear that t...

  • Ovira Australia t/a Ovira UK

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 11 December 2024

    Three paid-for Meta ads made unauthorised specific health claims, referred to an amount of weight loss, implied a food could prevent, treat or cure PCOS and symptoms of the menopause and made medicinal claims for an unlicenced product.  

  • Pulsio Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 11 December 2024

    A paid-for Facebook ad made misleading and unsubstantiated savings claims.

  • Vita Studio Pte Ltd

    • Upheld
    • In-game advertising
    • 04 December 2024

    An in-game ad for a mobile app game discouraged essential treatment for a condition for which medical supervision should be sought and misleadingly claimed the app could help treat sleep loss problems.

  • Stirling Health Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Press other (paid ad)
    • 20 November 2024

    A press ad made medicinal claims for an unauthorised product.

Informally resolved (1)
  • Rakhee Mediratta

    • 24 July 2024
    • Number of complaints: 0

    Topic: Medicines, remedies and therapies