-
Menwell Ltd t/a Manual
A paid-for Google ad promoted a prescription-only medicine to the general public.
-
2XU UK Limited
A paid-for Instagram ad for 2xu Recovery Compression Tights made medical claims without holding the applicable conformity marking and were not registered with the MHRA.
-
Dawn Hazeldine t/a Stockport Counselling Services
A webpage misleadingly claimed that they were associated with the BACP and implied that they’d received training and qualifications from them when this wasn't the case.
-
Action Rehab
A website for a rehab clinic referral company falsely implied that they were acting for purposes outside their business, that they owned clinics and that they had been approved by a public body. It also failed to make clear that they received a commission for their service.
-
Addiction Recovery Systems Ltd t/a Rehab Guide
A website for a rehab clinic referral company falsely implied that they were acting for purposes outside their business and that they provided treatment directly at clinics they operated and also failed to make clear that they received a commission for their service.
-
Better Health and Wellness
A paid-for Facebook ad was misleading as it didn’t make clear the nature of the content people would be served if they engaged with the ad.
-
Health and Wellness
A paid-for Facebook ad was misleading as it didn’t make clear the nature of the content people would be served if they engaged with the ad and also exaggerated the capability of laser eye treatment.
-
Help 4 Addiction Ltd
A website for a rehab clinic referral company falsely implied that they were acting for purposes outside their business, that they provided treatment directly at clinics they operated and that a local rehab facility could be accessed using their website. It also didn’t make clear that they received commission for...
-
Marketing VF Ltd t/a The Eco Experts
A paid-for Facebook ad for a laser eye surgery referral company falsely implied they were acting for purposes outside their business and that they directly provided laser eye surgery when this wasn’t the case. The ad also failed to make clear that they receive a commission for their service and misleadingly exagg...
-
Rehabs.uk
A website for a rehab clinic referral company falsely implied that they were acting for purposes outside their business and that they provided treatment directly at clinics they operated and also failed to make clear that they received a commission for their service.
-
Serenity Rehabilitation Ltd t/a Serenity Addiction Centres
A website for a rehab clinic referral company falsely implied that they were acting for purposes outside their business, that they provided treatment directly at clinics they operated and that they had been approved by a public body and also failed to make clear that they received a commission for their service.
-
UK Addiction Treatment Ltd t/a UKAT
A website for a rehab clinic referral company falsely implied that they were acting for purposes outside their business and misleadingly suggested that their service was impartial and that they offered professional counselling treatment.
-
Which Rehab Ltd
A website for a rehab clinic referral company falsely implied that they were acting for purposes outside their business, that they provided treatment directly at clinics they operated, that they had a direct relationship with insurers and that they had been approved by a public body. It also failed to make clear that t...
-
Ovira Australia t/a Ovira UK
Three paid-for Meta ads made unauthorised specific health claims, referred to an amount of weight loss, implied a food could prevent, treat or cure PCOS and symptoms of the menopause and made medicinal claims for an unlicenced product.
-
Pulsio Ltd
A paid-for Facebook ad made misleading and unsubstantiated savings claims.
-
Vita Studio Pte Ltd
An in-game ad for a mobile app game discouraged essential treatment for a condition for which medical supervision should be sought and misleadingly claimed the app could help treat sleep loss problems.
-
Stirling Health Ltd
A press ad made medicinal claims for an unauthorised product.
-
Excite For Life Ltd
A website made misleading claims that CBD was suitable for consumption by children, incorrectly stated that the recommended maximum consumption of CBD per day for adults was 70 mg and made general health claims that weren't accompanied by an authorised specific health claim.
-
Vape Life Ltd t/a CBDLife UK
A website made misleading claims that CBD was suitable for consumption by children and incorrectly stated that the recommended maximum consumption of CBD per day for adults was 70 mg.
-
Femgroup Ltd t/a Feminapause
A paid-for Facebook ad made claims that a supplement could treat symptoms of the menopause and misleadingly implied that the supplement had been approved by the Food Standards Agency.
-
Rakhee Mediratta
Topic: Medicines, remedies and therapies