Rulings (292)
  • Skill on Net Ltd t/a Gecko Play

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 08 April 2026

    A paid-for Instagram ad for a gambling website portrayed, condoned and encouraged gambling behaviour that was socially irresponsible and could lead to financial, social or emotional harm.

  • Persons unknown t/a Cloud Nine

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 01 April 2026

    A paid-for Facebook ad for a clothing company made medical claims for a product that didn’t have the relevant compliance labels and wasn’t registered with the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. The ad also discouraged essential treatment for a condition for which medical supervision should...

  • Sazerac UK Ltd t/a Hi-Spirits

    • Upheld
    • Poster
    • 01 April 2026

    A poster for an alcoholic drink was socially irresponsible by encouraging excessive drinking.

  • Mark Anthony Brands (UK) Ltd t/a White Claw UK

    • Upheld
    • Social media (own site)
    • 25 March 2026

    An Instagram Highlight on White Claw UK’s page, an alcohol brand, featured three Stories showing individuals who appeared to be under 25, breaching the alcohol advertising rules.

  • Persons unknown t/a Charmfay Shop

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 25 March 2026

    A paid-for YouTube ad for a clothing company made misleading claims regarding a product including images and the materials used to make them.

  • Centre of CPD Excellence

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 18 March 2026

    A website for an accreditation company made misleading claims it had panels of specialists, independent industry experts, accreditation against internationally recognised standards and official relationships with insurance partners.

  • Digital Vapers

    • Upheld
    • Leaflet
    • 18 March 2026

    A leaflet for a vape retailer featuring colourful cartoon-style fruit characters broke the rules by being likely to appeal particularly to people under 18 years of age.

  • Eastern Savings and Loans Credit Union

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 18 March 2026

    A paid-for Facebook ad for a credit union irresponsibly encouraged the purchase of non-essential items through the use of credit, particularly in relation to funding Black Friday and Christmas purchases.

  • Grind Coffee Roasters Ltd t/a Grind

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 18 March 2026

    An ad on Grind’s own website for its coffee pods failed to make the basis of a price comparison clear and misrepresented their competitor product’s end-of-life arrangements.

  • Humantra UK Operations Ltd t/a Humantra

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 18 March 2026

    A paid-for Facebook ad for electrolyte sachets broke rules prohibit claims that state or imply a food can prevent, treat or cure human disease. 

  • Riverside Credit Union Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 18 March 2026

    A paid-for Facebook post for a credit union irresponsibly encouraged excessive spending through the use of credit, particularly in relation to funding non-essential Christmas purchases.

  • Saeta Tech Ltd t/a PixVideo – AI Video Maker

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 18 March 2026

    A paid-for YouTube ad for an AI video maker which condoned digitally altering and exposing women’s bodies without their consent, was irresponsible, included a harmful gender stereotype and was likely to cause serious offence.

  • Smart Money Cymru Community Bank

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 18 March 2026

    A paid-for Facebook post for a credit union irresponsibly encouraged excessive spending through the use of credit, particularly in relation to Christmas.

  • TFS Buying Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 18 March 2026

    A paid-for Facebook ad for a buy now pay later arrangement irresponsibly encouraged non-essential spending through the use of credit, particularly in relation to funding non-essential Christmas purchases.

  • ZOE Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 11 March 2026

    [Republished ruling] A paid-for Facebook ad misleadingly claimed that a supplement didn’t contain any ultra-processed ingredients. 

  • British Gas Services Ltd t/a British Gas

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 04 March 2026

    A paid-for Meta ad for British Gas, which promoted switching to a heat pump, didn’t have enough evidence to demonstrate that ‘up to’ saving claims could be achieved by a significant proportion of people and also failed to include all material information.

  • Centrica Hive Ltd t/a Hive

    • Upheld
    • National newspaper (paid ad)
    • 04 March 2026

    A national press ad for Hive promoting solar panels didn’t have enough evidence to demonstrate that ‘up to’ saving claims could be achieved by a significant proportion of people and also failed to include all material information.

  • RTSB Ltd t/a Match Bingo

    • Not upheld
    • Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)
    • 04 March 2026

    [Republished ruling] A YouTube ad for Match Bingo, which featured the Tottenham Hotspur Football team, wasn’t inappropriately targeted to under-18s.

  • Wild Nutrition Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Poster
    • 04 March 2026

    A poster for a supplement company misleadingly claimed their ingredients came from food or natural sources.

  • Alliance Winds Ltd t/a linendaily

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 25 February 2026

    A paid-for Meta ad and a website listing for an online clothing company misleadingly claimed they were established and owned by armed forces veterans and that they donated a share of profits to PTSD support organisations.